|
Receive profiles such as this in your e-mail inbox every two
weeks! Just send a blank e-mail to:
things-and-other-stuff-subscribe@topica.com
The Silent Collection
By
Tammy Stone
The Merry Widow
Screens at 2003's Toronto International Film Festival®
Movies,
unlike the arts that came before it, have always been for
everyone, and modern technology made moving images the fastest spreading form of
entertainment in history. This is why early film enthusiasts, in addition to
dubbing cinema the Seventh Art, also acknowledged it as the most democratic one.
With so many people flocking to the movies, a revolution was born: mere
entertainers became stars with previously unimaginable levels of popularity;
books, plays and operas that few ever got around to familiarizing themselves
with became the inspiration for moving image works projected to millions;
authors, because they now had to work with whole teams of film producers and
crews, became notorious figures; and best of all, the success of cinema led to
more and more movies made, and more and more stories told.
So many of the
films from the Golden Era of silent cinema are lost to history, and of the ones
that are left – many of them classics and masterpieces – video cassette or DVD
viewings just can’t measure up to the experience of watching these movies the
way they were meant to be seen: on the big screen. More than that – for many art
house cinemas and cinematheques and venues like MoMA do screen classics on a
regular basis – there are precious few opportunities to hear movies the
way they were meant to be heard. In actuality, even the silent classics that
prevailed until the advent of synchronized sound were never really silent. A
regular feature of going to the movies was live orchestral accompaniment;
musicians were regularly employed to provide not only the musical score to
films, but to add the very first known “sound effects” with their instruments.
This
September, The Toronto International Film Festival® (September 4-13, 2003)
provides one of these rare opportunities to travel back in time, to an era when
going to the movies was akin to stepping into a dream, when the novel sensual
pleasures of watching films were at their sumptuous peak. For the fourth
consecutive year, the Festival presents a silent film with live musical
accompaniment at the Elgin Theatre, a decadent, lush space in downtown Toronto
with an old movie palace atmosphere. This year’s screening is the 1925 Erich von
Stroheim classic, The Merry Widow. As my series of silent film stars has
shown, the personalities behind the movies are often as colorful and worth
talking about as the movies themselves. The Merry Widow, however, is a
special instance of a film as engaging as the lurid tales of its creation,
myriad stories about the production, and larger-than-life creative team.
Von
Stroheim’s version of The Merry Widow is the first of three cinematic
adaptations of Franz Lehar’s operetta of the same name - the 1934 and 1952
versions were directed by Ernst Lubitsch and Curtis Bernhardt respectively.
While the ostentatious storyline isn’t exactly besides the point, it’s just one
of the reasons the film is so worth seeing, the others directly attributable to
von Stroheim’s visionary interpretation. Set in the fictitious kingdom of
Monteblanco, Prince Danilo (John Gilbert) has fallen in love with Sally O’Hara
(Mae Murray), a dancer and - even worse - a commoner. His uncle, King Nikita I,
strongly opposes this marriage and Sally winds up jilted at the alter. Despite
her grief, she rushes off to marry Baron Sadoja, an old, wealthy man not
apparently suited to the feisty young woman. The story doesn’t end there; the
Baron dies, leaving Sally with a lot of money and another chance at real love.
The battle for her affection begins.
The
Merry Widow, one of the last masterpieces to be made
in the silent era, was a success upon its release and remains, to this
day, an acknowledged classic worldwide - probably increasingly so with passing
years. But one of the most remarkable aspects of the film is that it was made at
all; a little insight into von Stroheim’s life and career will shed some light
on the miracle that is this film and the ease with which it was completed and
subsequently viewed by so many.
Erich
von Stroheim - otherwise known as “The Man You Love to Hate” - emigrated to the
United States from Vienna, Austria, and moved to Hollywood by 1914. He quickly
squeezed himself into all the important places, landing the plum role of
assistant director and military advisor to famed film pioneer D.W. Griffith (the
military angle stems from von Stroheim’s brief stint in the Austro-Hungarian
Army). He also acted, and played several Prussian officers once the U.S. entered
World War I in 1917. He began what would be a short tenure at Universal, where
he directed Blind Husbands (1919), The Devil’s Pass Key (1920) and
Foolish Wives (1922). This was the era prior to the Production Code
(1934), which banned many forms of sexual explicitness on screen, and von
Stroheim was particularly adept at depicting bawdy sexual subject matter.
It was also
during these formative years that von Stroheim established a reputation for
being an obsessive and controlling artist. Not only did he conceive the stories
for his films himself - a rare quality - but he designed his sets, took over all
aspects of production, and even acted in many of his own works. His diligence
paid off – these films are still widely considered ahead of their time in
sophistication and film artistry – but his efforts proved very taxing to
Stroheim, who didn’t want his vision interfered with by studio honchos. He left
Universal for Goldwyn Films, which was merging with Metro Pictures to become
MGM, and was assigned Greed, MGM’s first major release. While this is the
film Stroheim is most often associated with - many think it one of cinema’s
great masterpieces - it was actually a notorious fiasco that all but ended his
career as a director. He shot 42 reels and made an eight hour film that the
studio inevitably wrested from him and drastically cut, to under two hours. No
one went to see the movie and critics panned it.
Strangely
enough, Stroheim was sill hired by MGM to direct The Merry Widow.
Although he was still surly, controlling and unpleasant - I noted in my
biography of star Mae Murray that during the shoot she would refer to him as
“the dirty Hun” - he managed to shoot the film on schedule, within budget, and
with many of his ingenious personal touches. Still, he was dismissed from MGM,
and was fired from his next film, Queen Kelly (1928); the star of that
film, Gloria Swanson, couldn’t stand working with him, and she evidently had
more clout than he did. He made a few more films, but they all floundered, and
Stroheim resumed acting now and then, notably in Jean Renoir’s Grand Illusion
(1937) and Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard (1950).
Much
in the same vein as Orson Welles’ career was thwarted by his explosive
relationship with RKO Studios - who never let him finish his real masterpiece,
The Magnificent Andersons (1942) and led his career on a wayward path
- von Stroheim, one generation earlier, failed in his attempts to scale down
his oversized personality and creative genius to fit a studio mold. Because of
this, he was left to languish on the margins of cinematic achievement despite
obvious talent and seemingly limitless potential. As has happened with other
artists in the past, it was only after his death that respect and admiration for
von Stroheim grew; he became more highly regarded critically both in the US and
throughout Europe, and had obvious influence on European-émigré Hollywood
filmmakers like von Sternberg and Lubitsch. It is in this context that von
Stroheim’s work is best understood now.
The
Merry Widow is distinctively von Stroheim, while
remaining palatable to a wide audience always hungry for a lurid love story with
their favorite actors - John Gilbert and Mae Murray (“The Girl With The
Bee-Stung Lips”) were major attractions at the time, and at the peak of their
careers). It is a stylish film with its modern use of geometric compositions and
baroque mise-en-scene, and, like his earlier works, it also showcases von
Stroheim’s fascination with overt lascivious sexual references and, most
obviously in this film, an almost pagan philosophy of life-as-art. It is daring,
it is original, it is dark and lavish while also offering unabashed sentiment
and the decadent adornments of a period in history that inevitably waltzed
itself into oblivion - with panache until the very end.
The film holds
up well today, which can’t be said of a lot of cinema’s early product, wholly
due to von Stroheim’s authentic, hard-fought for ideas about cinema as art.
Watching The Merry Widow today is a feast for the eyes and a treat in
almost every way. The chance to watch it on a big screen in a space reminiscent
of the splendor of old movie palaces is hard to pass up. The once in a lifetime
opportunity to see it with a packed house and a live orchestra, featuring some
of Toronto’s finest musicians and conducted by Berndt Heller, cannot be missed.
For a couple of hours, the past will be ours.
****
The Merry Widow
screens on Friday, September 12 at 6:30 p.m. at the VISA Screening Room at the
Elgin Theatre, and is available as part of the VISA Screening Room Pass, or to
Pass and Coupon holders as one of their screening choices.
For more
information about 2003's Toronto International Film Festival®, please visit the
website,
http://www.e.bell.ca/filmfest/2003/default.asp.
#
Tammy Stone is a freelance writer and journalist based in Toronto. Watch for her
regular column on the greats of the Silent Screen in each issue of ASTOS.
Tammy invites you to write her at
stonetamar@hotmail.com
with any questions or comments on her column.
Receive profiles such as this in your e-mail inbox every two weeks! Just
send a blank e-mail to:
things-and-other-stuff-subscribe@topica.com
|